Answer: No. A staff member requesting additional time to review his or her decision to execute SF 312 should have a reasonable period of time. The particular circumstances of the situation must determine the appropriate time. However, in any situation, the Agency or contractor should, in writing, impose on the worker the extra time he or she has to make that decision. In all situations where the execution of SF 312 is delayed, the staff member should also be informed of the criminal, civil or administrative consequences that may result from unauthorized disclosure of classified information, while the person has not yet signed the confidentiality agreement. (a) Anyone, for the purpose of obtaining information that respects national defence, with the intention or reason to believe that the information should be used for the violation of the United States or in the interest of a foreign nation, enters, steals or otherwise receives information about a ship, aircraft, defence work, shipyards, navy, naval station , from the submarine base, gas station, fort, battery, torope, shipyard, canal, railway, Arsenal warehouse, factory, mine, telegraphe, telephone, wireless or signaling station, building, office, laboratory or station or any other place related or built to national defense, or under construction by the United States or under the control of the United States or their officers, departments or agencies , or within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States or a place where ships, aircraft are manufactured, prepared, repaired, stored or researched or developed, under a contract or agreement with the United States, or with a department or agency of these vessels, or with a person on behalf of the United States, or in some other way on behalf of the United States or a place prohibited by the President in the event of a war or national emergency. who prepares or builds or stores anything for the intervention of the army, the marine army or the air force, in such a way that the prohibited places of national defence identified by the President are altered; Or answer: no. SF 312 as amended was approved by the National Security Council as a requirement of NSDD 84 and by the Department of Justice as an enforceable instrument in court. An agency cannot accept an agreement in which the language has been unilaterally changed by the signatory. (b) all staff from management services and independent agencies or offices who have not yet signed SF 189 must sign SF 312 before accessing classified information. A staff member who has previously signed SF 189 may, according to his own selection, replace an SF 312 signed by SF 189.

In these cases, agencies take all reasonable steps to cede the replaced confidentiality agreement or to indicate that it has been replaced. (k) Only the National Security Council can respond to an agency`s request to dispense the use of SF 312. To apply for a waiver, an agency must submit to the director of ISOO its proposal for an alternative confidentiality agreement, along with a justification for their use. The Director of ISOO will ask the Ministry of Justice to rule on the applicability of the replacement agreement before making a recommendation to the National Security Council. An agency that has previously waived the use of SF 189 or SF 189-A is not entitled to request the abandonment of the use of SF 312. The Treaty of San Francisco (講) San-Furanshisuko Kéwa-Jayaku, also known as the Peace Treaty with Japan, Nihon-koku to Heiwa-Jayaku Steps, restored peaceful relations between Japan and allied powers on behalf of the United Nations to formally end hostilities and seek reparation for actions until World War II.

Share on Tumblr

Comments are closed.